Hard to say

The answer to this question depends greatly on what standard you want to take into consideration. Samsung clearly is growing faster than all competitors, but the margins go there at the same time in the cellar. Apple is growing more slowly, but with much higher profits. The iPhone is a popular smartphone with lush margins.

can Asymco that we have these graphics to contend that they are grouped according to their manufacturers current growth vectors in pairs. In the following video you can see the pretty. Apple destroyed Nokia, RIM ironed Sony Ericsson and Samsung Motorola leveled. Also in HTC and LG’s on something, but so slowly that we ignore for now.

The battle for supremacy

Comparing the figures for 2007 and 2010, then it all the more meaningful. For example, Apple is indeed the star, but lack of funds just is not the dominant player. A role she plays as Microsoft Windows in the PC sector, has still not able to fight. Well, the starting point for Apple is not bad, but it has long been decided yet.

One last thought: If I look at Nokia so, I feel bound to keep the troops around the CEO of largely incompetent. Had the Simply Palm Symbian bought and scrapped the stupid, maybe they would have retained their dominant position. Too bad, because most of Nokia’s hardware was pretty good.